Fisher Gold Bug Pro Metal Detector Review – A Complete Machine for the Gold Finders
The Fisher Gold Bug Pro has been in the marketplace for many years currently, and it's evidenced itself to be an awfully capable at finding gold nuggets. What I have exclusive return to get great results from once mistreatment it's however well the target ID feature works thereon. Most area units that I hunt moderate to extraordinarily trashy, and having the ability to fairly determine what the target is within the ground is admittedly helpful.
The Gold Bug, Pro Metal detector, is on par with most different VLF detectors that area unit designed for locating gold nuggets once it involves depth. It's obvious limitations at depth in comparison to a detector mistreatment pulse induction technology. Most targets that I dig with it area unit 10” in less within the ground.
For sure, a bigger piece of metal can hold forth at a lot of deeper than that. However, the standard gold lump advisement up to some grams is sometimes found among that high 10”. The smaller flakes and “crumbs” area unit typically restricted to among some inches of the surface.
As for sensitivity, the fisher gold bug pro detector is usually compared to its forerunner, the Gold Bug two. The GB2 has been around for nearly twenty years currently and incorporates a legendary name for its extreme sensitivity to little gold. I have seen it notice little bits of alluvial sediment that were thus little they wouldn’t even register on a digital scale.
While this can be a limitation of the machine, I feel that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks in most things for some reasons. The extraordinarily high in operation frequency creates that produces. The GB2 such a sensitive detector also can make it extraordinarily troublesome to work in bound things. In some places that have extremely mineralized ground or Associate in the Nursing abundance of “hot rocks,” mistreatment the GB2 are often nearly not possible.
Search at Trashy Locations
I know that countless lump hunters feel the necessity to dig all targets and that I can agree that this can be an honest selection in several areas. However, once searching in extraordinarily trashy locations, excavation all targets is just not realistic. I have been in places that I wouldn’t have gone over fifty feet in an exceedingly whole day if I had chosen to dig each piece of metal.
Associate in Nursing previous sluice box or a pile of cans from a hundred years alone are often reduced to virtually thousands of metal scraps nowadays.
- Computerized Ground Grab Tm
- Static pinpoint with depth indicator
- Dual electro-acoustic transducer jack
- 19kH in operation Frequency
- Independent management over threshold and gain
- Continuous ground conditions readouts
- Rea-Time computerized Ground balance
- Requires 1-9vold battery
- The discrimination system (V-Break) works alright
- Light and nice to seem at
- Exceptionally sensible on low conductors: this could be a hammer killer!
- The sensitivity to high conducting metals is extremely sensible too
- The detector responds to small gold chains in each mode (disc and AM)
- Modulation of the signal works fine and is extremely pleasant to use
- The ground balance is extremely straightforward to regulate, be it mechanically (Ground grab) or manually
- The detector loses its settings once turned off
- The target ID (on the higher scale) in AM works solely to restricted depth
- Changing from disc to AM needs turning a knob. Bit odd
As mentioned earlier, what I like in the fisher gold bug pro metal detector is its wonderful target ID. Currently detain mind that you simply forever need to seek for gold within the all-metal mode, instead of indiscriminate mode. In theory, you'll use a discrimination to blank out iron targets, however actually, it doesn’t work well because the overall sensitivity is reduced considerably and ends up in incomprehensible gold. It's far better to run in All-Metal mode and use the target ID to come to a decision whether you would like to dig a target.